Richard
Branson today called for a radical review of global aviation policy
including the removal of restrictive ownership and operational
regulations and the creation of a free market in take off and landing
slots – which could raise up to £10 billion. The money raised could
remove the need for the unpopular Air Passenger Duty or provide airports
with funding for vital improvements in airport infrastructure.
Richard Branson was speaking at the “Future of Air Transport” conference
in London where he launched Virgin Atlantic’s Aviation Manifesto
“Freedom in the Skies“. The main elements of the manifesto are:
· The creation of a Trans Atlantic Common Aviation Market, encompassing
US, Canada, UK and rest of the EU, within which airlines would be free
to operate without restriction.
· A reform of slot allocation at all the world’s leading airports
through the ending of “Grandfather Rights” and the leasing of slots to
be operated by airlines on a fixed term basis.
The manifesto outlines Virgin’s vision for the future and Richard’s call
to the Government to prepare the industry for the 21st Century:
“Over the past century the aviation industry has made enormous technical
progress, but it is still held back by out-dated government regulation
and interference. It is about time air transport was treated like the
mature industry it so clearly is. What this means is removing the dead
hand of government as much as possible. The role of government in the
regulation of air transport should be limited to ensuring that
competition is fair and safety is paramount, the same role adopted for
most other industries.
“The main challenge before us now is to persuade the Americans to
negotiate a fully liberal air services agreement. Without a doubt, there
are two ways guaranteed not to achieve this objective: give in to the US
and accept their model, as the UK has come perilously close to doing on
more than one occasion; or drip-feed concessions to the US, which risk
wholly undermining the UK’s negotiating leverage.
“It is a fact that we have to accept that the UK is unlikely alone to
persuade the US to abandon its protectionist policies. To succeed in
doing that we have to use the strength of Europe as a whole. This is why
Virgin has for long urged the UK Government to support a mandate for the
European Commission to negotiate with the US.
“There is a real chance of reproducing what we have achieved within
Europe, and what the Americans achieved in their domestic market, by
creating a Trans-Atlantic Common Aviation Area. That would open up
enormous new opportunities for ambitious, innovative as well as
benefiting consumers.
“We are certainly ready for the challenge. And it wouldn’t stop there.
An agreement between the EU and US would soon be expanded as other
liberal-minded countries sought to join. It would not be long before the
bulk of international aviation was at last dragged into the 21st
Century.”
Richard highlighted the other key proposal:
“As long as access to key airports around the world remains limited, the
availability of take-off and landing slots will be a major barrier to
expansion for airlines such as Virgin Atlantic. Unlike BA, we have not
had the advantage of having been given by our former government owner a
large route network and its associated slots.
“The key obstacle here is the so-called “Grandfather Rights” which have
the effect of cementing into place the current structure of the
industry. This has to change if we are to have real competition. Virgin
has proposed a system whereby slots are granted only for a limited
period, just as franchises for TV or radio stations are. At the end of
the period they should be handed back and re-allocated.
“We also believe that the most effective way of allocating slots is to
sell them to the highest bidder, with safeguards against abuse by
dominant airlines. We estimate that if slots at Heathrow and Gatwick
were granted for 10-year periods and auctioned to the highest bidder,
the Treasury could raise up to £10 billion during the next decade. The
money raised could remove the need for the unpopular Air Passenger Duty
or provide airports with funding for vital improvements in airport
infrastructure before Britain falls further behind the rest of the
world.” |