The World Conference on New Trends
and Measures in the Hotel Industry, jointly organized by the World Tourism
Organization (WTO) and the International Hotel and Restaurants Association
(IH&RA) have suggested a cautious, albeit systematic approach to hotel
classification at world level with a view to reconciling the legitimate demands and concerns of consumers and industry with the obligations
of the governments.
The Conference held from 26-27 April in St. Petersburg, Russia and was
attended by 210 participants from 22 countries. The Conference was opened
by the WTO Secretary-General Francesco Frangialli, Deputy Minister of Economic
Development and Trade of Russian Federation Vladimir Strzhalkovsky and the
IH&RA Chief Executive Officer Alain-Philippe Feutré, co-chaired by Mr. Henryk
Handszuh, WTO Chief of Quality and Ms. Natela Shengeliya, Chief of the Russian
Tourism Department.
"Governments need to review and update regulatory measures and incentives
to promote investments in the sector in the face of ongoing liberalization
and expectations that such investments contribute to sustainable development and
poverty alleviation and meet consumers' demand for competitive, safe and quality
services," said the WTO Secretary-General Mr. Francesco Frangialli in his opening
address.
The Conference dealt with such important issues for the hotel industry
today as the desirability of classification schemes, mechanisms to attract
investments, the importance and training of human resources and the role of
hotel chains.
Russian representative for classification discussions Ms. Margarita
Nemolyaeva said "the current lack of coherence among the variety of existing national hotel
classifications is responsible for consumer complaints in her country, adding that
there was an urgent need for a solid, objective and universally acceptable referent
in this area".
It was observed during the event that a common international understanding
on hotel classification could be helpful in multilateral trade negotiations.
The WTO and IH&RA (a WTO Affiliate Member) should devise a methodology and
tools for setting up hotel classifications schemes which could be recommended
to countries, delegates concluded. This methodology should include:
- provisions for respect of cultural diversity and differences in a
systematic manner;
- references to basic norms which could be recognized as minimum standards
of universal application irrespective of cultural differences, which are
vital to all human beings and consumers and correspond to ethics and the
satisfaction of their basic needs;
- mechanisms of consultations and cooperation between the public and
private sector;
- consultations with consumers to which effect the provisions of the
United Nations Guidelines for Consumer Protection should be used, particularly by
devising consumer surveys and soliciting consumer response;
- provisions regarding consumer redress;
- a request for the universal use of common terminology in the hotel
industry and respective classifications by adapting and developing standard EN ISO
18513-2000 for this purpose;
- provisions on classification audits and relationship between
classification and licenses to operate;
- provisions on additional elements which may be determined through
international consultation in order to make this instrument comprehensive and
transparent.
"The Conference did not pretend to seek enactment or even to impose an
international hotel classification scheme, but a mentioned document could
represent a reasonable measure devised by the major stakeholders in addressing
the complex nature of tourism and the demands of consumers and industry" said
co-chairman Mr. Handszuh. "New hotel classification referents could be used
voluntarily in different countries, taking into account the local practices and
conditions." According to WTO, public-private partnership is crucial in the
development of these endeavours.
The existing approaches to hotel classification issues are rooted in the
various cultural and administrative traditions. Some of them, inspired by
Roman Law, provide for government intervention and public classification
systems aimed at informing and protecting the consumer. It should be noted,
though, that such public systems are, as in Spain, increasingly decentralized in favour of regional
authorities. On the other hand, models more widely accepted in Anglo-Saxon and
Nordic countries provide for either consumer protection through justice, the same
as in Germany, or through voluntary certification mechanisms, as in the United
Kingdom.
This part of the discussion at the Conference was based on a recent joint
WTO-IH&RA project, a status report and study on hotel classification. This
study shows that there is a diversity of situations world-wide; that while
consumers seek transparency and protection of their rights to truthful information which
classifications should carry, the industry requires a fair framework for free
competition which classifications should not blur.
WTO and IH&RA therefore concluded that "it would be advisable to devise a
methodology providing those countries wishing to set up a national or regional
classification scheme with the necessary tools to do so", and that "cultural
differences between countries in terms of service and facilities according to
destinations, regions and purpose of travel" should be taken into consideration in
this exercise.
The picture has become even more complicated due to the expansion of
global and national hotel chains. This growing trend in the industry is reflected by the
fact that over 20 per cent of a total of 16 million rooms world-wide are now
controlled by a dozen leading chains. Major chains often consider that their
brands themselves provide appropriate standards, making redundant any classification.
The participants appealed to national and local governments and to the
hospitality industry to closely cooperate in advancing the various issues
discussed at the Conference in St. Petersburg. |