IATA has emphasized the need to focus on
competitiveness as Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) moves
forward with the building of a third runway and associated
infrastructure.
“The announcement by the Financial Secretary in
his budget speech that the third runway will be built by 2023
should be greeted by everyone in Hong Kong as encouraging news. We
commend the government on this important decision and everyone
associated with the project especially the Hong Kong Airport
Authority and the government for the thorough work to get us to
this point including evaluating the environmental impacts and
working out how to mitigate them,” said Tony Tyler, IATA’s
Director General and CEO in a speech to the Foreign Correspondents
Club of Hong Kong.
HKIA plays a crucial role as an economic
catalyst. Hong Kong is home to some 3,500 regional headquarters
and boasts a HK$250 billion tourism industry. Serving some 63
million travelers and processing 4.4 million tonnes of cargo makes
HKIA a critical link in global connectivity.
“IATA has long been an advocate of the need for
a third runway in Hong Kong. And it is in the interest of everyone
in Hong Kong to see the aviation industry flourish. Aviation and
aviation-related tourism account for 8.2% of the Hong Kong
economy. Increasing HKIA’s capacity to be able to serve 100
million passengers and 9 million tonnes of cargo by 2030 will
ensure that the airport continues to be a pillar of Hong Kong’s
success—provided the expansion is built, financed and funded
wisely,” said Tyler.
Establishing a three runway system at HKIA is
estimated to cost HK$150 billion (US$19.3 billion). IATA outlined
a framework that would allow this critical piece of infrastructure
to be built without increasing airline charges, without placing a
burden on taxpayers, without making it more expensive for
travelers, without adding an extra burden to shippers and while
increasing competitiveness of the hub’s air transport network.
HKIA is consistently profitable. For FY 2013/14
HKIA had a pre-tax profit of HK$7.8 billion which is about half of
revenues. It also has very little debt—just about 10% of total
capital. IATA proposes that the airport use its advantageous
financial situation to fund its expansion through borrowing via
commercial loans or bonds. The current level of charges (applied
to both existing facilities and newly built infrastructure) and
business model would provide sufficient revenue for loan
repayment.
“Airlines fully back the user pays approach on
infrastructure development. We are not asking for anyone to foot
the bill for our growth. Airlines would pay for the
infrastructure—through increased volumes, not increased charges.
And that would apply to existing infrastructure as well as newly
built facilities. The growth in traffic that the extra runway and
terminal will bring will see the airport’s success over its first
17 years repeated all over again – provided its airport charges
are kept competitive,” said Tyler.
“While the new facilities are being built, the
airport’s dividend to the government will reduce. Any normal
business faces the same situation when it makes a major capital
expenditure to support its future success. No legitimate return
ever comes without some up-front investment. And let’s remember
that the airport’s value to Hong Kong was never intended to be
only in the profits it generates. In fact, its role as a catalyst
for economic activity makes a much broader contribution to the
community and the government,” Tyler added.
IATA urged that the expansion must follow the
well-established principles of the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO), particularly noting that proposals for
advance payment of the construction costs must be avoided and
encouraging ongoing consultation between the airport and the
airlines.
No Advance Payments: “Airlines accept the
user-pays principle, but the user should only start to pay when
there is something to use! You cannot charge a toll for a bridge
that is not yet built or for a tunnel that is yet to open. The
same is true for airport infrastructure. Airlines and travelers
cannot be expected to pay for a runway until they are able to
benefit from its use,” said Tyler.
Advance payments for the cost of the third
runway would mean increasing current airport charges which
airlines reject. “Raising charges for advance payment of
construction costs would be wrong in principle and unfair.
Airlines and passengers using the airport today would be paying
for those who use it tomorrow. And, most importantly for Hong
Kong, it would be taking risks with a business model that’s been
proven to work very well. Since the airport opened in 1998, Hong
Kong’s airport charges have become competitive. As a result,
airlines have wanted to come here, and the airlines already
here—especially those based here—have added frequency and
capacity,” said Tyler.
IATA estimates that a 10% increase in user
charges could lead to annual reductions in passenger numbers by up
to 80,000 and place some 600 jobs in jeopardy.
Consultation: The successful expansion of HKIA
and fortifying its competitive position of its air transport
network will require continued open and transparent consultation
with airlines—on both funding and operational issues.
“Airlines are eager to be partners in developing
the future of HKIA. Moving from a two-runway operation to three
runways is complex. The master plan for the airport is clearly
established and supported by the airlines. The devil may be in the
details. Developing a satellite terminal and reconfiguring (and in
some cases demolishing) existing infrastructure needs to be done
in such a way as to enhance competitiveness. It would be a shame,
for example if the expansion in capacity resulted in an increase
in the minimum connection time,” said Tyler.
The competitiveness of Hong Kong’s air transport
network is under pressure. Between 2005 and 2013 Hong Kong’s share
of the market connecting China to the rest of the world shrank
from 20% to 17%. It has stagnated with a 10% market share on the
ASEAN to North America market. And its 3.3% share of ASEAN to
Europe traffic has contracted to 2.4%.
“There are lots of reasons why these changes are
happening. The Middle East airlines are proving to be strong
competitors with efficient and affordable hubs being a central
piece of their success. And hubs closer to Hong Kong continue to
improve their offerings to enhance the competitiveness of their
networks. This is putting pressure on Hong Kong. HKIA has a
winning model of competitive charges and high quality. Funding the
much-needed third runway must be done in a way that does not put
it at risk and which secures HKIA’s role as an economic catalyst
for years to come,” said Tyler.
HKIA,
IATA,
Hong Kong
|