It will come as no surprise that the
ever-increasing everyday use of smartphones spills over to the
tourist experience.
Dr Dan Wang of the School of Hotel and Tourism
Management (SHTM) at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
co-authors in a recently published research article, argue that
“understanding how the smartphone shapes the tourist experience
cannot be separated from the way it is used in one’s everyday
life”, to the extent that “everyday life and travel should not be
viewed as completely separated entities, but rather special cases
of each other”.
The impact of technology on travel
evolves, they suggest, “as the traveler gains experience using new
technologies” and the benefits those technologies bring.
Smartphone use is most definitely transforming
our daily lives, allowing us to listen to music, take photographs,
socialise with friends, obtain information and make purchases
wherever we want. This should have clear implications for travel,
but the researchers note that tourism is still seen as somehow
distinct from everyday life. It is time that travel is no longer
seen as “a temporary reversal of everyday activities” that
essentially involves “a no-work, no-care, no-thrift situation”,
they argue. With friends and family – and the workplace – now just
a swipe away, it is increasingly difficult to truly switch off,
leading to a “decapsulation” of the tourist experience.
The researchers argue that there is a “mutual
penetration of the experiences from the travel context and
everyday life context”. Although keeping in constant contact with
those at home and having a wealth of information about the
destination in one’s pocket may diminish the sense of adventure
and escape, it can enhance the travel experience. Yet even though
there is a great deal of evidence that tourists use mobile
technology before, during and after their trips, a thoroughly
convincing explanation for why that is occurring has not been put
forward.
Most often, technology adoption is seen as
being influenced by perceived usefulness, ease of use and the
potential for risk, without any appreciation of how that adoption
takes place over time. This, argue the researchers, “contributes
little to our understanding of how smartphone use actually shapes
trip planning and, consequently, the tourist experience”. Instead,
they suggest that smartphones structure our everyday lives in
certain ways, which in turn influences how we travel.
To determine the extent to which smartphone use spills over
from everyday life into tourism, the researchers carried out
in-depth interviews with experienced US travellers. The
interviewees owned and used smartphones running one of the top
three operating systems – iOS, Android and Blackberry. They had
also travelled for leisure at least three times in the past year,
with at least one trip occurring in the three months leading up to
the interview. Finally, they subscribed to unlimited data plans,
which was likely to encourage the most frequent smartphone use.
The interviewees were fairly evenly divided between
the sexes and represented a wide range of age groups, from 18-30
to 61-70. They were asked about their everyday use of smartphones,
the subsequent changes in their communication and information consumption, and whether smartphones had influenced both their
“travel planning and experience” and the “functions and information services” they used while travelling.
The uses to which the interviewees put smartphones in their daily
lives fell into five broad categories: communication, entertainment, online social networking, information search and
acquisition, and facilitation (of services such as banking and navigation). Although the uses varied by interviewee, a remarkably
common narrative emerged. Most interviewees would wake up to the
smartphone alarm and then browse the news, connect to a social
network or read email. They tended to listen to the radio or music
on the way to work, periodically check the weather, news and stock
prices during the day, shop, collect travel ideas or pay bills
during lunch hours, and watch TV and/or surf the Internet in the
evening.
The majority of the interviewees said that
“smartphones were more or less part of their life”. The devices
made them feel “more connected”, “more informed”, “more
innovative” and “more productive”.
The researchers
identify five distinct ways in which smartphones changed the
interviewees’ lives: increased communication with family and
friends, the filling of all downtime, increased information search
activities, greater interest in exploring technology and the partial replacement of laptops/desktops. The latter change in
particular is transforming activities that were once
location-specific to those that can be performed anywhere. That
transformation is further fuelled by the multifunctional nature of
smartphones, the researchers note. Everyday activities such as
listening to music, navigation and taking photos used to be
completed separately with mp3 players, GPS and cameras before
smartphone use, but now these can be performed “with only one
device”.
Given that smartphones are concentrating
our use of technology and making us more aware of its benefits, it
should not be surprising that the researchers found considerable
overlap between the everyday and travel uses of smartphones. Uses
during travel largely originated in the interviewees’ daily lives
“because of habits and social norms and obligations”.
Of the activities that smartphones influenced or reshaped
during daily life, only a handful differed when it came to the
travel experience. These understandably included such
travel-specific activities as flight tracking and check-in and
hotel booking. When describing their smartphone use during travel,
the interviewees were explicit about the “spillover” effects. For
instance, they noted “that they felt more social obligations
during trips because they got used to frequent communication” in
their daily lives. Hence, “routines and habits were carried to the
context of travel”, the researchers explain.
When
the interviewees described the changes in the tourist experience
brought about by smartphone use, they were almost universally
positive and largely in accord with those experienced in everyday
life. The greater connectivity that the devices afforded helped
the informants to feel “more connected with family and friends”,
“more secure” and “less isolated”. The entertainment options made
available allowed the interviewees to “be themselves” while
travelling. Facilitation apps afforded greater convenience, and enhanced information acquisition and search abilities provided the
flexibility to re-plan and re-schedule while travelling.
As the researchers put it, smartphone use “clearly has the
potential to substantially alter the tourist experience”, largely
through extending “the structures and spirit of smartphones” to
the travel context. This, they write, helps to “de-exoticise”
tourism by confirming it as “a special state of technology use
that is connected with other settings”. Practitioners should be
aware of “the interconnectedness of different locales, contexts,
and channels of information and communication for today’s
smartphone-equipped tourists”, they conclude.
SHTM,
PolyU,
Hong Kong,
Travel Trends,
Technology,
Mobile
|