According to IATA, the 2011 accident rate for
Western-built jets was the lowest in aviation history, surpassing
the previous mark set in 2010.
The 2011 global accident rate
(measured in hull losses per million flights of Western-built
jets) was 0.37, the equivalent of one accident every 2.7 million
flights. This represented a 39% improvement compared to 2010, when
the accident rate was 0.61, or one accident for every 1.6 million
flights.
A hull loss is an accident in which the aircraft is
destroyed or substantially damaged and not subsequently repaired
for whatever reason including a financial decision by the owner.
“Safety is the air transport industry’s number
one priority. It is also a team effort. The entire stakeholder
community - airlines, airports, air navigation service providers and
safety regulators - works together every day to make the skies
safer based on global standards. As a result, flying is one of the
safest things that a person could do. But, every accident is one
too many, and each fatality is a human tragedy. The ultimate goal
of zero accidents keeps everyone involved in aviation focused on
building an ever safer industry,” said Tony Tyler, IATA’s Director
General and CEO.
Safety by the numbers:
- 2.8
billion people flew safely on 38 million flights (30 million by
jet, 8 million by turboprop) - 11 hull loss accidents involving
Western-built jets compared to 17 in 2010 - 92 total accidents
(all aircraft types, Eastern and Western built) down from 94 in
2010 - 5 fatal hull loss accidents involving Western-built jets
down from 8 in 2010 - 22 fatal accidents (all aircraft types)
versus 23 in 2010 - 486 fatalities compared to 786 in 2010
- Fatality rate dropped to 0.07 per million passengers from 0.21
in 2010 based on Western-built jet operations
IATA member
airlines outperformed the industry average for accidents of all
aircraft types by 23% (1.84 accidents per million flights compared
to 2.40). The IATA Western-built jet hull loss rate, at 0.41
accidents per million flights, was slightly higher than the
average for the industry.
“The accident rate for airlines
on the IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) registry was 52%
better than for non-IOSA operators. These numbers show that IOSA
is helping to drive safety improvements for the entire industry,
not just IATA member airlines. Of the 369 airlines on the IOSA
registry, 130, or 35% of the total, are non-IATA member airlines,”
said Tyler. He noted that IOSA registered airlines flew 64% of all
commercial flights in 2011, and that IOSA now includes 68 Safety
Management System (SMS) standards that provide a baseline SMS
assessment.
Regional Review - Western-built Jet Hull Loss
Rates
- Asia Pacific (0.25), Europe (0.0), North America
(0.10) and North Asia (0.0) performed better than the global
average of 0.37.
- Asia Pacific, Europe and North Asia recorded
improvements compared to their performance in 2010, while North
America stayed the same.
- The Commonwealth of Independent
States (1.06) was higher than the global average and also higher
than last year (0.0).
- Latin America and the Caribbean
performed better than 2010 (1.28 in 2011 vs.1.87 in 2010), but was
still almost 3.5 times worse than the global average.
- The
rate for the Middle East and North Africa region worsened to 2.02
from 0.72 in 2010.
- The rate for Africa improved by 56% to
3.27 from 7.41 in 2010 but still was the worst performing region
in the industry. IOSA carriers in Africa had a zero hull loss rate
in 2011.
Safety in Africa and the Commonwealth of
Independent States (CIS)
The total number of accidents for
African airlines dropped from 18 in 2010 to 8 in 2011. The total
accident rate for African airlines that are on the IOSA registry
was almost equivalent to the world average, while the accident
rate for airlines that are not on the IOSA registry was more than
five times as high. The same trend occurred in the CIS, where the
accident rate for IOSA-registered airlines was more than five
times better than the rate for non-IOSA registered airlines.
“The problems of Africa are complex and include both
insufficient government oversight and a lack of infrastructure
investment. It is quite clear from the industry’s performance that
global standards like IOSA are an effective means to improve
safety. We are eager to work with governments to make IOSA a part
of their safety oversight programs,” said Tyler.
Accident
Analysis
Runway excursions, in which an aircraft departs a
runway during a landing or takeoff, were the most common type of
accident in 2011 (18% of total accidents). This is slightly
reduced from 2010 when runway excursions accounted for 21% of
total accidents reflecting industry efforts to reduce their
frequency. Despite industry growth, the absolute number of runway
excursions decreased from 23 in 2009 to 20 in 2010 and 17 in 2011.
88% of runway excursions occurred during landing.
Unstable approaches - situations where the aircraft is too fast,
above the glide slope, or touches down beyond the desired
touchdown point - and contaminated runways are among the most
common contributing factors to runway excursions on landing.
IATA’s Global Safety Information Center (GSIC) provides trend
analysis that is helping the industry improve performance. For example, a new Flight Data eXchange (FDX) system within the GSIC
tracks unstable approach performance for the more than 700 airports in the database. Sharing such safety data complements the
work of the Runway Excursion Risk Reduction (RERR) Toolkit, the second edition of which was launched in May 2011, and fuels global
efforts to find solutions.
Ground damage was another
concern, accounting for 16% of accidents in 2011. This was up from
11% in 2010. These accidents include events such as damage
resulting from ground handling operations and collisions during
taxi. IATA has launched a number of initiatives to address ground
accidents. In 2008, IATA launched the IATA Safety Audit for Ground
Operations (ISAGO). This is the first global standard for the
oversight and auditing of ground handling companies. Subsequently,
IATA has launched the IATA Ground Operations Manual (IGOM) and the
Aircraft Ground Damage Database (GDDB) to collect and analyze
reports of ground damage from participating operators and ground
service providers.
Sharing Information
Data sharing
is helping to identify and reduce risks. In 2010 the International
Civil Aviation Organization, the US Department of Transportation
and the European Commission agreed with IATA to create the Global
Safety Information Exchange (GSIE). This was enriched in 2011 with
the addition of databases covering ground damage and flight data.
“The wider that we cast our net to collect safety information, the
more effective we can be in allocating resources to mitigate
identified risks. Further developing GSIE is a model for
international cooperation that continues aviation’s great
tradition in this area,” said Tyler.
“Aviation’s good
record is not the result of complacency. The strong performance in
2011 should not distract us from the need for continuous
improvement to drive the accident rate even lower. An even safer
future will be built on the foundation stones of global standards,
cooperation between industry and government and information
sharing,” said Tyler.
See other recent news regarding:
Airlines,
Airports,
Awards,
Flights,
Codeshare,
FFP,
Inflight,
Lounges,
First Class,
Business Class,
MICE,
GDS,
Rewards,
Miles,
Hotels,
Apartments,
Promotions,
Spas,
Yoga,
Retreat,
New Hotels,
Traffic,
Visitor Arrivals,
Cruises,
Free Deals,
Interviews,
Videos,
Tickets,
IATA,
Safety,
Security
|