As
we all know, the two major travel trade exhibitions and events are in
Europe, the ITB in March, and secondly the WTM in November. This from an
Asian standpoint cannot be a good thing when you consider the costs and
time involved in attending either of these shows.
That
is why it is of paramount importance that the travel industry within
Asia supports 'its own' shows and exhibitions to entice the buyers,
sellers and media to come to Asia rather than let them rely on our
attendance at one of the European events.
Currently
Asia has two 'generic' major travel trade exhibitions and events, the
ATF in January, and the PATA Travel Mart now in October. The
ATF inaugurated in 1981, is now, many would argue, regarded as the
largest of the two, especially in recent years, but it has one major
problem and that is that only companies from ASEAN can exhibit. This
exclusion of such important markets as China, Japan, Korea, India,
Australia, New Zealand and of course other countries interested in
one of the fastest growing marketplaces in the world, has been one of the main
factors in restricting the growth of the ATF. The
PATA Travel Mart inaugurated in 1978, also has a faithful following, but
has had the more turbulent history of the two especially in recent
times. Traditionally the PATA Travel Mart would move annually from
country to country (as does the ATF) giving exhibitors, buyers, and
media an ideal opportunity to meet with smaller more localised
operators, learn and update themselves about different destinations and
cultures, and quite simply add a little spice to our annual trade show
pilgrimages. So what went wrong ? Some would say that the 1997 economic
crisis which coincided with the move of the mart to Singapore for 10
consecutive years was the catalyst to lower attendance numbers, this
mingled with strict entrance policies led to PATA's decision to manage
the show themselves under a radically new format. Of
the two, PATA seem to be facing the hardest challenge as they need to
reinforce the industries belief in the mart, and ensure that this years
event which is to take place in a highly
congested travel trade show period from October 1- 3 in Singapore
(before commencing a regional rotation) is a success. Strangely it may
well be one of the ATF's strengths that could benefit PATA, which is to
say changes made within a single organisation such as PATA can be made
and implemented much faster than when 10 different member countries need
to be addressed, which is the case with ASEAN. The
ATF is slowly opening it doors and this years ATF included dialogue
partners, China, Japan and Korea, but these countries only currently
participate in dialogue rather than active participation during TRAVEX. It was also
announced that ASEAN have signed a very important reciprocal agreement
with the ITB that will see the ITB exhibit at the ATF 2004 and ASEAN to
exhibit at the ITB 2003. This
agreement with the ITB (Messe Berlin) should not be underestimated and
could well pave the way for more co-operation in the future, the
MesseBerlin has been interested in Asia for quite some time, as was
shown when the now failed International Tourism Asia (ITA), the product of a union between global exhibition organisers Miller Freeman and ITB Berlin organisers Messe
Berlin, was launched in 1999 in Hong Kong . The
PATA Travel Mart knows this only too well, and are offering some very
exciting packages to attract in buyers, going as far as offering money
back guarantees for earlybird confirmations. PATA Director of
Business Development, Stephen Yong attended for the first time in its
long history the ATF, to promote PATA as an association and of course
their annual events. While PATA is faced with a difficult task, its
greatest resource and major advantage is its large member base, combined
with the fact that it has no geographical boundaries with which to
restrict exhibitors. Can
both survive ? Definitely, but the real question here is which will emerge
as the dominant show for the Asia markets ? which will become as valuable
to the worlds tourism industry as the ITB ? The need is certainly there,
and it may well be down to which show listens best to the needs of this
ever changing market, and the speed in which it is able to implement needed
changes. What
we in Asia should not forget though, is that in order for these, the
shows closest to home, which bring in much needed business and foreign
exchange, to succeed, they need our support, and perhaps given time, we may even have an
ITB or similar in our own backyard. See
you at the PATA Travel Mart 2003 - Singapore October 1 - 3. |