IATA has called on European governments and
regulators to bolster European competitiveness with measures
focusing on improved global connectivity.
“There is a very long list of things that Europe
can and should do to improve the operating environment for its
aviation sector. And the motivation for that is because aviation
generates jobs and grows the economy through connectivity. A
successful aviation sector improves European competitiveness” said
Tony Tyler, IATA’s Director General and CEO, in a keynote address
to a dialogue session between the European Union (EU), the
European Civil Aviation Conference, and the European air transport
industry taking place in Vienna.
The benefits of connectivity can only be fully
realized if airlines—the core of the aviation value chain—are
strong. Europe’s airlines are financially the weakest amongst the
world’s major regions. European airlines are expected to realize a
post-tax net profit of just $2.8 billion this year, for an average
net profit margin of just 1.3% or just $3.23 per passenger. By
comparison, North American airlines are expected to earn about
$11.09 per passenger.
In addition to urging Europe to continue to
shore-up the foundation of its air transport sector—safety,
security and sustainability—based on global standards, Tyler
called on governments to address the competitive disadvantages
they generate in the areas of taxation, regulation and
infrastructure.
“Among the biggest obstacles faced by European
airlines are the competitive disadvantages placed in their way by
Europe’s governments. The region’s airlines are over-taxed and
onerously regulated. Moreover, they suffer from a chronically
mismanaged air traffic management system, insufficient airport
capacity and infrastructure costs that are simply too expensive.
It’s time to do something about it,” said Tyler.
Infrastructure
The priority list for infrastructure is
topped by the Single European Sky (SES) and Tyler called for
strong support of the SES2+ package to clear the way for rapid
progress on this long-delayed project. This package of measures
has three vital elements:
- Establishment of an independent economic
regulator for European air navigation performance. When combined
with the strengthened target setting authority of the Commission,
it will ensure appropriate recognition and equitable contributions
from all member states. Greater independence of the National
Supervisory Authorities will also be a key enabler of better
performance.
- Re-organization and unbundling of ATM support
services. “Europe’s competitive position cannot afford to be
compromised by the enormous costs of duplicated and often-times
incompatible support services. The EUR 30 billion investments in
SESAR cannot be justified if organizational inefficiencies are not
eliminated,” said Tyler.
- Provision of an effective framework for
Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) to deliver value. Today FABs
exist on paper, but we have not seen any reduction in
fragmentation or the optimization of airspace, human and technical
resources that they were meant to achieve. “All they have done so
far is to provide a fig-leaf to cover a complete lack of forward
progress on the part of Europe’s community of air navigation
service providers,” said Tyler.
“SES will reduce delays, cut emissions, raise
safety levels and contribute to the creation of 320,000 jobs
across Europe. It is critical for Europe’s future, but progress
has been frustratingly slow and the costs are enormous. Consumers
lose EUR 6 billion in time and productivity on top of which is the
EUR 3 billion burden on operations and 7.8 million tonnes of
unnecessary carbon emissions. The leadership of individual states
is needed to turn Europe’s air navigation service monopolies into
customer-focused and cost-effective members of the air transport
value chain,” said Tyler.
Airports
IATA called for European policy-makers to
take urgent actions to avoid a predicted airport capacity
shortfall which is expected to reach 12% by 2035 according to
Eurocontrol.
In addressing this looming shortfall, IATA urged
Europe’s governments to refine the EU Airports package with a much
stronger mandate for independent regulators to apply
well-established international norms that bring about fair
charging regimes.
“As a basic principle, we believe that airports
need effective economic regulation to achieve three goals starting
with providing protection from excessive charges. Regulation must
also incentivize efficiency gains and drive service quality
levels. Finally, it should aim to maximize the value of
investments by aligning with customer needs through true and
transparent consultation processes,” said Tyler.
Taxation
“In 2014, the European governments will collect
nearly $40 billion in taxes from airlines and passengers. To put
that into perspective, that is more than double the taxes
collected in the Asia Pacific region. Many governments there value
aviation more for the long-term economic value that the industry
makes possible, than for short-term tax receipts,” said Tyler.
Some European governments are beginning to
understand the economic damage that excessive taxation on
connectivity can do. The Irish government, for example, removed a
departure tax in order to stimulate the economic benefits of
connectivity.
Regulation
In many areas, excessive or misguided regulation
has weighed down Europe’s air transport industry. Regulation can
be a powerful and effective enabler. This is the case in areas
such as safety or economic regulation to counter-balance
significant market power. But it must be appropriately focused.
“Experience teaches that we achieve the best results on regulation
when governments focus on real, not imagined, problems and take
full advantage of expert advice and consultation. It is also
important to calibrate regulation and taxation carefully to
promote global connectivity and ensure that the costs imposed by
regulation do not exceed its benefits. Finally, regulation should
respect global standards wherever they exist,” said Tyler.
“Passenger Rights is a good example of where
European regulation has got it wrong. EU regulation 261 is not
only a competitive disadvantage for airlines; it also fails in its
mission to protect passengers. Its draconian measures penalize
airlines for things beyond their control. It injects regulation in
an area where market forces could do a better job. The constant
widening of its application as interpreted by courts continuously
makes the “competitive disadvantage” worse. And, it competes—even
conflicts—with some 60 other passenger rights regimes around the
world. From the passenger’s perspective, all this protection is
just a confusing mess,” said Tyler.
IATA asked that work that the International
Civil Aviation Organization is doing to develop core principles on
consumer protection be reflected in the EU’s review of Regulation
261.
IATA
|