Developing technologically advanced information
systems may not be sufficient for airlines to increase their
operational efficiency and passenger satisfaction, according to Dr
Norman Au of the School of Hotel and Tourism Management (SHTM) and
Dr T.C.E. Cheng in a recent research article.
Advanced technology has the potential to bring
many benefits to airlines, but not on its own. As frontline
employees are the actual users of the information systems that
airlines deploy, it is crucial that more attention be paid to how
satisfied they are with using those systems.
Airlines are an important sector of the tourism
industry and have contributed significantly to its recent growth.
The researchers suggest that increasing economic pressure has
encouraged airlines to develop more advanced information systems
to “gain overall operational efficiency and passenger
satisfaction”.
Information systems are used to handle operations
such as reservations, seat allocations, passenger check-in and
baggage handling. Such systems can also provide “high-level
decision support systems and yield management systems” to help
airlines in their strategic decision making.
Many airlines offer various internet services
for passengers that make use of information systems, such as
online seat reservation, e-ticketing and check-in services.
However, as many customers do not feel comfortable using such
services and their uptake remains low, the researchers argue that
“providing quality service through human interaction” remains an
important part of airlines’ service delivery. This essentially
means that airline employees remain the dominant users of airline
information systems.
Yet employees are not simply just the end-users
of airline information systems. They are also, according to the
researchers, “one of the most significant assets of an airline”.
It thus makes sense to ensure that employees are satisfied with
the systems they depend on for their work, because “an unhappy or
frustrated service operational employee can greatly influence the
overall experience of the airline customers”.
Some airlines seem to be aware of the need for
IT training and have allocated considerable resources to it in the
hope of ensuring employees satisfaction with their information
systems”. However, the researchers argue that a better
understanding of employees’ perceptions and expectations of such
systems would benefit airlines by helping them to make
improvements, which in turn would improve overall performance and
profitability.
The researchers surveyed the Hong Kong employees
of eight airlines to assess various factors that may have
influenced their satisfaction with the information systems they
used at work. One obvious factor that the researchers needed to
consider was the performance of the system. Yet even though
airlines might expect staff to be satisfied if the system they use
performs well, that might not necessarily be the case.
Although a high-performing system may be
technologically sound, it may fail to meet its objectives because,
as the researchers point out, “psychological and organisational
issues are not well addressed during the development,
implementation, and initial use” of the system. Hence they decided
to assess users’ expectations of the system, whether the benefits
gained from using the system matched the effort needed to use it
and how much input users had in the design and development of the
system.
The researchers received replies from 199
employees who “routinely use IS at work and also have direct
contact with customers”. Around three-quarters of the respondents
(78%) were female and again around three quarters (76%) were aged
between 22 and 30. Approximately one-third had a undergraduate
degree or above level of education (30%). More than half of the
respondents (53%) had worked for their current airlines for more
than 10 years, which the researchers suggest indicates a “rather
low level” of turnover.
The researchers found that both the actual and
expected performance of an information system influences user
satisfaction, which is “not surprising as it is difficult to
imagine that a technically poor performing IS can satisfy users at
work”. Good performance is particularly important for frontline
employees, because a “small technical glitch or a slight delay
could be disastrous for passengers”.
Nevertheless the performance of the systems only
barely exceeded staff expectations. The researchers suggest that
airlines should not only ensure their information systems are
technically sound, but should also collect user feedback that
“could provide useful clues as to what performance and features
the users expect”. Regular communication would also ensure that
end users have “a realistic view” of the benefits and limitations
of the system.
How equitable users find the system, in terms of
the effort required to use it relative to the benefits they gain
from using it, appears to be even more important than the actual
and expected performance of the system. In other words, users
weigh up whether the amount of effort and frustration involved in
learning to operate the system is worthwhile given the benefits
that it delivers. The researchers suggest that to ensure their
information systems deliver benefits “at a cost seen by the end
user as worth obtaining in return”, airlines should reduce the
amount of input required to use them. For instance they could
provide “useful training to new or ‘techno-phobic’ employees” to
reduce the time and effort involved in learning.
Surprisingly, the amount of involvement users
have in the design and implementation of an information system
does not seem to be related to their satisfaction with it. To
remedy this situation, the researchers suggest that airline
operations require specifically developed and complex information
systems with “seamless integration” of internal and external
systems “between front-line service operations and back office
administration”.
Frontline staff members are generally well aware
that their involvement in system design and implementation “could
have little impact and control on the final outcome”, according to
the researchers. They speculate that operational staff may be
happier if they are kept well informed about what to expect from
the information system than if they are included “in the complex
technical system development process” when they are aware that
“they only have a limited role to play”.
The researchers conclude that a technically
sound airline information system “is a necessary, but perhaps not
a sufficient component, to exploit the full advantage of
technology”. Airlines’ increasing use of information calls for
“higher levels of communication and cognitive skills from
employees”, which the researchers suggest may cause them to
“experience more job-related stress”.
PolyU,
Hong Kong
|